
Hey there, let’s talk about a platform that’s basically printing money - OnlyFans. Last year alone, it raked in a staggering $7.22 billion in gross revenue and $1.41 billion in net revenue with just 42 full-time employees. That’s right, by revenue-per-employee, it’s leaving giants like YouTube, Twitch, TikTok, and Instagram in the dust.
With 4.6 million creators and 377.5 million fans worldwide, the user base is nothing short of massive. Growth? Steady, sticky, and global. On paper, this is the kind of dream investment that should have venture capitalists tripping over themselves to sign a check.
So why hasn’t it sold? Why is this unicorn still sitting pretty on the market with no takers? Let’s dive deeper, because the answer isn’t just about the numbers - it’s about something a little spicier.
Here’s the tea - OnlyFans’ majority owner, Leonid Radvinsky, has been shopping the platform around, but every deal seems to hit a wall. It’s not the economics that’s scaring buyers off. It’s the core of what OnlyFans is known for: adult content.
Wall Street and its gatekeepers see the platform’s dominance in the adult market as a big red flag. It doesn’t matter that the business model is rock-solid or that users are shelling out cash for personal, intimate connections rather than just free content flooding the internet. The stigma of sex work clings to OnlyFans like a shadow, making it ‘toxic’ in the eyes of institutional investors.
'OnlyFans has revolutionized how people connect and monetize intimacy, but the stigma around its core content is a barrier that even billions in revenue can’t break through just yet,' a tech industry analyst remarked.
Here’s what makes OnlyFans so special - and so scary to buyers. It’s convinced millions to pay for content in a world where free clips are everywhere. How? By flipping the script: think bedrooms over studios, ring lights over film crews, and creators who chat back, respond, and even send custom videos.
Fans aren’t just watching - they’re tipping, flirting, and feeling like they’re part of the experience. That personal touch is the glue keeping subscribers hooked month after month. But it’s exactly this intimacy that makes big capital turn up their noses.
Sociologist Erving Goffman called stigma a 'spoiled identity' - something contagious by association. For OnlyFans, investing in it means risking a reputational hit. In the polished world of venture capital, that’s a scarlet letter no one wants to wear.
OnlyFans isn’t blind to the issue. Back in 2021, they briefly flirted with banning explicit content under pressure from banks and payment processors - only to reverse course after a massive creator backlash. Since then, they’ve tried to pivot, inviting fitness coaches, chefs, musicians, and even fashion brands to join the platform.
Restaurants have dabbled in branded content, but let’s be real - fitness tips and recipes aren’t what made OnlyFans a household name. These attempts at a ‘respectable’ image just highlight the bind they’re in. The more money they make, the more scrutiny they face, amplifying both opportunity and moral panic.
For investors, that’s a hard pass. But for creators and fans, it’s a win - the intimacy economy is booming, and OnlyFans is still the biggest player in the game.
Payment processor issues, app store bans, and skittish banks are often blamed for OnlyFans’ sale struggles. But let’s not kid ourselves - these hurdles are just extensions of the same stigma. Strip away the ‘adult content’ label, and OnlyFans looks like the most efficient social platform out there.
With a valuation of $8 billion - barely more than a single year of its revenue - it’s clear the market isn’t seeing the full picture. In another universe, OnlyFans would be Silicon Valley’s shining star. But in this one, it’s the dirty little secret everyone loves to use but no one dares to buy.
So, will a brave buyer ever step up to claim this crown jewel, stigma and all? Only time will tell, but for now, OnlyFans remains the ultimate forbidden fruit of tech investments.