Trans Influencer Spills The Tea On Alleged $30K Spend By Charlie Kirk

The Allegations and Viral Reaction

In a twist that has social media buzzing, trans influencer Jade Trap Girl claims that the late Charlie Kirk, a conservative commentator, secretly subscribed to her OnlyFans account – spending a staggering £22,640 ($30,000) in the process. This revelation, coming weeks after Kirk's assassination in September 2025, has set the online world alight, with many pointing to the irony of Kirk, known for his critical stance on OnlyFans and anti-trans views, allegedly supporting a trans creator.

Jade fueled the fire by posting on Instagram that she had the 'receipts', which only added to the frenzy. The internet was quick to react, with numerous posts circulating screenshots purportedly tying the transactions to an account allegedly linked to Kirk. Many users highlighted the apparent contradiction between Kirk's public persona and these alleged actions.

“The alleged use of his legal name has led to speculation that these actions starkly contrast his public views,” noted online commentators.

Technical Red Flags

Despite the viral uproar, several technical inconsistencies raise questions about the authenticity of these claims. According to OnlyFans' strict privacy policies, content creators can't access subscribers' legal names or credit card details. They can only view display names, which subscribers can change at will, making it impossible for creators to verify identities based on usernames alone.

The screenshots in question show only a public display name, not verified subscriber data. Analysts have pointed out that this information is insufficient to confirm a user's identity, as similar or misleading usernames can easily be adopted by multiple users.

Testing the Legitimacy

Skepticism mounted when X user Jason Sawyer decided to test these claims. He attempted to register an OnlyFans account with the handle 'ownthelibz1776', reportedly associated with Kirk. To his surprise, the handle was available, suggesting it wasn't linked to any existing account.

Sawyer's findings cast further doubt on the legitimacy of the allegations. He emphasized that OnlyFans does not allow duplicate usernames, so if the handle was available, it couldn't have belonged to Kirk. Sawyer concluded that without verified platform data, the allegations remain speculative.

Broader Social Implications

The controversy has ignited debates about privacy, the responsibilities of public figures, and the impact of viral allegations. While some rushed to label Kirk as hypocritical, others called for caution until more evidence could corroborate the claims.

This incident has also highlighted how quickly unverified information can shape public opinion, especially when amplified on social media. Though Jade Trap Girl's claim of having the 'receipts' captured widespread attention, no independent verification has yet emerged to substantiate her assertions.

Media watchdogs warn about the dangers of misinformation, noting that emotionally charged claims can gain undue credibility even without technical support. Despite the alleged $30,000 spend dominating online chatter, privacy policies and a lack of verified data suggest that firm conclusions are still far off.

As the saga unfolds, it underscores the lasting intrigue surrounding Charlie Kirk and the swift influence of online communities in shaping perceptions without confirmed facts.