Charlie Kirk'S Alleged Onlyfans Subscription Sparks Online Frenzy - Fresh Celebrity News 2025

About the Allegations

The internet was abuzz with chatter when trans OnlyFans model JadeTrapGirlTS dropped a bombshell allegation: Charlie Kirk, the conservative commentator, had allegedly subscribed to her OnlyFans under the username "ownthelibz1776." According to Jade, Kirk spent a whopping $30,000 on her content before his untimely passing on September 10th, 2025. This claim emerged in late November 2025 and set social media on fire, generating countless reactions and memes.

“I’m exposing him because of the harm he did to the trans community,” Jade stated in her now-deleted Instagram post, providing screenshots she claimed showed Kirk's subscription details.

However, the internet's excitement was short-lived as further investigation revealed that the allegations were unverifiable. Users on OnlyFans can freely change their usernames and display names, making it nearly impossible to prove the identity behind an account.

The Origin and Spread of the Rumor

On November 21st, 2025, JadeTrapGirlTS, who also manages the Instagram page jadetrapgirlxoxo, shared a provocative video accusing Kirk of being her secret subscriber. In the video, set to the tune of "We Are Charlie Kirk," Jade showed screenshots of an account named "ownthelibz1776" and a name reading "Charles James Kirk," supposedly derived from credit card details. The post quickly gained traction, amassing over 380 likes and 30 comments in a mere two weeks.

The rumor's viral journey didn’t stop there. TikTok user @djsoulchildac contributed to the buzz with a video discussing the allegations, which racked up over 190,000 views in just six days. Another TikToker, @giodelcarmen, joined in on the action, expressing shock in a reaction video that garnered more than 160,000 views within a day.

The Debunking and Aftermath

Just as the rumor was reaching its peak, Snopes stepped in on November 26th, 2025, with an article aiming to debunk the claims. Their investigation concluded that the allegations were unfounded, primarily because OnlyFans allows users to adopt any username, rendering subscriber identity verification impossible. Furthermore, OnlyFans does not disclose credit card information to content creators, adding another layer of doubt to the claims.

In a twist, the account in question even updated its description to clarify: "I am not Charlie Kirk, I am Foilmanhacks." Snopes' "Bottom Line" section emphasized that no verifiable evidence supported the claim linking Kirk to the account.

Despite the debunking, the story of Charlie Kirk's alleged OnlyFans subscription continued to thrive online, inspiring numerous memes and discussions across social media platforms. The saga serves as a fascinating glimpse into the power of social media storytelling and the ease with which rumors can spread in the digital age.